In our Bratislava to Bern EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 37 minutes, completing the 893km route in 9h 27min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 2023's 505km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 9h 27min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~157 kWh
- Distance: 893km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
10h 4min |
9h 27min |
| Charging time: |
55min |
23min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~161 kWh |
~160 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (11 min, 41% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (22 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (22 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bern
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Burger King (11 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Migrol (12 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 37-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 893km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~157 kWh vs ~168 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons