In our Bratislava to Bucharest EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 4 minutes, completing the 1021km route in 11h 46min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 11h 46min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~161 kWh
- Distance: 1021km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 46min |
11h 50min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
1h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~184 kWh |
~184 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (23 min, 14% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Timisoara (23 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (20 min, 20% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Timisoara (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Pitesti Retail Park (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Basarab (10 min, 13% → 29%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 4-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1021km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 1h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~161 kWh vs ~169 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons