In our Bratislava to Bucharest EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 70 minutes, completing the 1013km route in 10h 55min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 2023's 505km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 10h 55min (70 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~178 kWh
- Distance: 1013km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
12h 5min |
10h 55min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
35min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~182 kWh |
~183 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Szatymazi nyugat (10 min, 27% → 36%)
-
Stop 2:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (49 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (39 min, 10% → 75%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrom DN7 (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (20 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 70-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 1013km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~178 kWh vs ~191 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons