In our Bratislava to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model Y Performance by 33 minutes, completing the 1537km route in 15h 49min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 49min (33 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~239 kWh
- Distance: 1537km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
15h 49min |
16h 22min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~277 kWh |
~277 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Haidt Nord (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (11 min, 18% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: London
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Donautal Ost (10 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststätte Epgert (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Carpool Maasmechelen (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (10 min, 14% → 53%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 33-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Performance on this 1537km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 1h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~239 kWh vs ~280 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons