In our Bratislava to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 22 minutes, completing the 2355km route in 24h 43min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 43min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~367 kWh
- Distance: 2355km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 43min |
25h 5min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~424 kWh |
~424 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Nord (10 min, 16% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Backstage Pub (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de La Coucourde (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gasparets (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Zunder Avia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bäckerei Bachmeier (10 min, 16% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Weißensberg Autohaus Riess (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Kölliken Nord (12 min, 17% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Fontanelles (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de La Coucourde (13 min, 12% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Gasparets (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 22-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2355km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~367 kWh vs ~432 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons