In our Bratislava to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 49 minutes, completing the 2355km route in 24h 43min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 43min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~367 kWh
- Distance: 2355km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
24h 43min |
25h 32min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
1h 55min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~424 kWh |
~424 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Nord (10 min, 16% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Backstage Pub (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de La Coucourde (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gasparets (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Zunder Avia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bäckerei Bachmeier (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Stegen (10 min, 14% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Migrol Westside (10 min, 16% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Fontanelles (11 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de La Coucourde (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Gigean Nord (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
ANDGO (13 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Vila Sana (13 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 10:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (18 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 49-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 2355km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 1h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~367 kWh vs ~417 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons