In our Bratislava to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 51 minutes, completing the 1286km route in 14h 40min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 40min (51 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~236 kWh
- Distance: 1286km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
14h 40min |
15h 31min |
| Charging time: |
1h 7min |
1h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (17 min, 25% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (37 min, 10% → 91%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 22% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (10 min, 29% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Plan (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (37 min, 11% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 23%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 22% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 51-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1286km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 1h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons