In our Bratislava to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 41 minutes, completing the 965km route in 9h 33min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 33min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~157 kWh
- Distance: 965km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
9h 33min |
10h 14min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~174 kWh |
~174 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 57% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (24 min, 11% → 79%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (17 min, 25% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (41 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 41-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 965km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~157 kWh vs ~165 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons