In our Bratislava to Sofia EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 by 80 minutes, completing the 969km route in 10h 23min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Mercedes-Benz EQV 300's 334km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 10h 23min (80 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~190 kWh
- Distance: 969km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
11h 43min |
10h 23min |
| Charging time: |
2h 24min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~174 kWh |
~174 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bábolna (10 min, 62% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (38 min, 20% → 93%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (21 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (37 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (26 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV (12 min, 10% → 31%)
- Arrival: Sofia
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (20 min, 16% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (16 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Gazprom (23 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (17 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 80-minute advantage over Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 on this 969km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~190 kWh vs ~261 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons