In our Bratislava to Sofia EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 13 minutes, completing the 966km route in 10h 21min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 10h 21min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~152 kWh
- Distance: 966km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 21min |
10h 34min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
1h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~174 kWh |
~174 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (25 min, 14% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (42 min, 10% → 98%)
-
Stop 3:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (19 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (23 min, 20% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 13-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 966km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~152 kWh vs ~160 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons