In our Brussels to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 49 minutes, completing the 2773km route in 27h 57min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 57min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 2min
- Energy: ~432 kWh
- Distance: 2773km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
27h 57min |
28h 46min |
| Charging time: |
2h 2min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~499 kWh |
~500 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (11 min, 28% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Trieben (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (19 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Skotina dir Athen (24 min, 10% → 81%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Hub Suben (10 min, 12% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (31 min, 18% → 88%)
-
Stop 8:
Makpetrol A1 (24 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 9:
Skotina dir Athen (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 49-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2773km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 2min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~432 kWh vs ~509 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons