In our Brussels to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 37 minutes, completing the 1172km route in 11h 34min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 34min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 36min
- Energy: ~215 kWh
- Distance: 1172km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 34min |
12h 11min |
| Charging time: |
36min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~211 kWh |
~212 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (12 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Mer McDonald's (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
EnBW Rastpark24 (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1172km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 36min vs 1h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons