In our Brussels to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model Y Performance by 58 minutes, completing the 2173km route in 22h 0min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 0min (58 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~355 kWh
- Distance: 2173km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
22h 0min |
22h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
2h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~391 kWh |
~391 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
EWE Go McDonald's (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Medenbach West (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
EWE Go McDonald's (10 min, 11% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Weierbachweg (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (17 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV DN69 (19 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 58-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Performance on this 2173km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~355 kWh vs ~397 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons