In our Brussels to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 15 minutes, completing the 2174km route in 21h 58min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 58min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~338 kWh
- Distance: 2174km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 58min |
22h 13min |
| Charging time: |
1h 7min |
1h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~391 kWh |
~391 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Seniorenresidenz (13 min, 12% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Donautal West (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV DN69 (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2174km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 1h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~338 kWh vs ~399 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons