In our Brussels to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 53 minutes, completing the 1554km route in 15h 50min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 50min (53 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 47min
- Energy: ~254 kWh
- Distance: 1554km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
15h 50min |
16h 43min |
| Charging time: |
47min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~280 kWh |
~280 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Blois-Villerbon (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire des Groies (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (10 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bauer Paris Occasion (13 min, 44% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Ste Maure de Touraine (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire des Groies (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire Fontbelleau Paris Bayonne (11 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger McDonald's (17 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Repsol Lopidana (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (20 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 53-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1554km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 47min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~254 kWh vs ~270 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons