In our Brussels to Milan EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 24 minutes, completing the 878km route in 9h 26min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 26min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~161 kWh
- Distance: 878km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 26min |
9h 50min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
46min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~158 kWh |
~158 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Saverne Monswiller, Eckartswiller (10 min, 19% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Emmen Center, Emmen (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Milan
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Longeville-lès-Saint-Avold Sud, Longeville-lès-Saint-Avold (14 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Rue du Rosenkranz, Houssen (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Knutwil Süd, Knutwil (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Lavorgo Sud, Faido (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 24-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 878km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 46min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons