In our Brussels to Milan EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 42 minutes, completing the 883km route in 9h 27min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model X 2023's 460km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 9h 27min (42 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~155 kWh
- Distance: 883km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
10h 9min |
9h 27min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
23min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~159 kWh |
~158 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Howald, Luxemburg (16 min, 51% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Volkswagen Mulhouse Espace 3000, Sausheim (18 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Hotel Seerausch, Beckenried (23 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Milan
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cora, Dorlisheim (10 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Migrol Emmenbrücke, Emmen (13 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 42-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 883km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~155 kWh vs ~182 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons