In our Brussels to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 56 minutes, completing the 1468km route in 16h 37min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 37min (56 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~240 kWh
- Distance: 1468km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
16h 37min |
17h 33min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~265 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Autohof Vechta (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rewe (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 12% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Münsterland Ost (19 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
KFC (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Decathlon (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Erhvervspark (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Vikingagrillen (11 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 56-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1468km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~240 kWh vs ~243 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons