In our Brussels to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 41 minutes, completing the 1471km route in 16h 47min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 47min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~264 kWh
- Distance: 1471km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 28min |
16h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 36min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~265 kWh |
~265 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (13 min, 14% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Burger King (12 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Autohof Vechta (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
AVIA Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Lynladestation (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 41-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1471km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~264 kWh vs ~272 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons