In our Brussels to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 21 minutes, completing the 871km route in 8h 54min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 54min (21 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~142 kWh
- Distance: 871km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
8h 54min |
9h 15min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
40min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~157 kWh |
~157 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parkplatz Nadelöhr (10 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Zschopauer Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Prague
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Parkplatz Nadelöhr (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Thöreyer Straße (10 min, 23% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Zschopauer Straße (10 min, 14% → 50%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 21-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 871km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~142 kWh vs ~149 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons