In our Brussels to Prague EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 13 minutes, completing the 874km route in 9h 36min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 36min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~138 kWh
- Distance: 874km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
9h 49min |
9h 36min |
| Charging time: |
1h 11min |
58min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~157 kWh |
~158 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aggertal Süd (14 min, 21% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
EDEKA (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
Parkplatz Nadelöhr (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Hornbach (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Gablenz-Center (19 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Parkplatz Nadelöhr (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Hornbach (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Gablenz-Center (15 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 13-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 874km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~138 kWh vs ~148 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons