In our Brussels to Prague EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 16 minutes, completing the 874km route in 9h 20min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 9h 20min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~171 kWh
- Distance: 874km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
9h 36min |
9h 20min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
42min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~157 kWh |
~158 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aggertal Süd (10 min, 25% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
EDEKA (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Parkplatz Nadelöhr (13 min, 13% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Hornbach (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Gablenz-Center (15 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Prague
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Siegerland West (10 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Pfefferhöhe (10 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Thöreyer Straße (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Zschopauer Straße (11 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 16-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 874km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons