In our Brussels to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 41 minutes, completing the 1796km route in 20h 0min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 0min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 0min
- Energy: ~293 kWh
- Distance: 1796km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 0min |
20h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
1h 41min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~323 kWh |
~323 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
SB Tank Langer (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Genshagen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Vilniaus (15 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Irxleben (10 min, 14% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohaus König (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Auchan (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K (24 min, 10% → 32%)
-
Stop 7:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 41-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1796km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 0min vs 1h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~293 kWh vs ~322 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons