In our Brussels to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 122 minutes, completing the 1796km route in 20h 0min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 0min (122 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 0min
- Energy: ~293 kWh
- Distance: 1796km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
20h 0min |
22h 2min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
3h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~323 kWh |
~323 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
SB Tank Langer (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Genshagen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Vilniaus (15 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Schmiedestraße (10 min, 31% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (12 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Koryta (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen A2 MOP Krzyżowniki (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Karczma Rzym (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (63 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K (20 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 10:
VS Express (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 122-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1796km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 0min vs 3h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~293 kWh vs ~297 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons