In our Brussels to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 340 minutes, completing the 1796km route in 20h 0min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 0min (340 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 0min
- Energy: ~293 kWh
- Distance: 1796km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
| Travel time |
20h 0min |
25h 40min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
5h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~323 kWh |
~334 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
SB Tank Langer (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Genshagen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Vilniaus (15 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Riga
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Friedrich-Engels-Allee (10 min, 48% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Wiesenau (15 min, 11% → 39%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (25 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Sycowska (61 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel Port Kopytkowo (19 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 7:
Ford Gołębiewski (118 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 8:
Rastplatz (42 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 340-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 1796km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 0min vs 5h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~293 kWh vs ~371 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons