In our Brussels to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Alpine A290 by 94 minutes, completing the 1454km route in 14h 54min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 54min (94 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~237 kWh
- Distance: 1454km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Alpine A290 |
| Travel time |
14h 54min |
16h 28min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
2h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~262 kWh |
~263 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire du Haut Koenigsbourg, Orschwiller (11 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Lavorgo Sud, Faido (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Alpine A290 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger SuperGreen, Terwen (10 min, 19% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest, Keskastel (12 min, 13% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Rue du Rosenkranz, Houssen (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost, Basel (10 min, 17% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Migrol Rotzlochstrasse, Stans (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Lavorgo Sud, Faido (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Lario Ovest, Cadorago (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Secchia Ovest, Modena (13 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 11:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (12 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 12:
Giove Ovest, Giove (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 94-minute advantage over Alpine A290 on this 1454km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 2h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~237 kWh vs ~260 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons