In our Brussels to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 77 minutes, completing the 1453km route in 14h 52min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 52min (77 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~226 kWh
- Distance: 1453km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
14h 52min |
16h 9min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~262 kWh |
~263 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Saverne Monswiller, Eckartswiller (10 min, 32% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
GoFast Area Servizio Gottardo Sud, Ambri (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger SuperGreen, Terwen (10 min, 27% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest, Keskastel (10 min, 22% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Rue du Rosenkranz, Houssen (12 min, 14% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Knutwil Süd, Knutwil (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
GoFast Area Servizio Gottardo Sud, Ambri (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Lario Ovest, Cadorago (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 13% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
Secchia Ovest, Modena (10 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (13 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 77-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1453km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~226 kWh vs ~265 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons