In our Brussels to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 85 minutes, completing the 2078km route in 21h 3min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 3min (85 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 42min
- Energy: ~373 kWh
- Distance: 2078km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 28min |
21h 3min |
| Charging time: |
2h 48min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~374 kWh |
~373 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Medenbach West (12 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
EWE Go McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Ladepark wild & bolz eMotel (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (36 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
JP Putevi Srbije (19 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (23 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Nürnberger Straße 25 (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 18% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 85-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2078km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 42min vs 2h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~373 kWh vs ~385 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons