In our Brussels to Vienna EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 8 minutes, completing the 1113km route in 11h 4min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km range doesn't beat the Audi e-tron GT's 389km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 11h 4min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~249 kWh
- Distance: 1113km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
11h 12min |
11h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
56min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~200 kWh |
~199 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Medenbach West (12 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
EWE Go McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (11 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bad Camberg West (18 min, 12% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
JET Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 8-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1113km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons