In our Bucharest to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 5 minutes, completing the 2211km route in 22h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 24min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 10min
- Energy: ~344 kWh
- Distance: 2211km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 29min |
22h 24min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
1h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~397 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Roggendorf (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Hadikgasse (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Donautal Ost (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Haidt Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 5-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 2211km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 10min vs 1h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~344 kWh vs ~361 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons