In our Bucharest to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron beats the Lotus Eletre by 39 minutes, completing the 2210km route in 22h 32min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Lotus Eletre's 480km range doesn't beat the Audi A6 Avant e-tron's 478km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
- Total time: 22h 32min (39 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~347 kWh
- Distance: 2210km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron |
Lotus Eletre |
| Travel time |
22h 32min |
23h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
1h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~398 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (13 min, 14% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle Bergisch Gladbacher Straße 417 (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Lotus Eletre Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (14 min, 32% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Steinhäusl (10 min, 14% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Haidt Nord (15 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
Hünxe Ost (10 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron achieved a 39-minute advantage over Lotus Eletre on this 2210km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 1h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~347 kWh vs ~497 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons