In our Bucharest to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 69 minutes, completing the 2210km route in 22h 32min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220's 500km range doesn't beat the Audi A6 Avant e-tron's 478km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
- Total time: 22h 32min (69 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~347 kWh
- Distance: 2210km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
22h 32min |
23h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
2h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~398 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (13 min, 14% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle Bergisch Gladbacher Straße 417 (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (27 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (17 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (21 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Raststätte Epgert (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Rastplatz Helderloh (12 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron achieved a 69-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2210km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 2h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~347 kWh vs ~385 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons