In our Bucharest to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range by 72 minutes, completing the 2207km route in 22h 24min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 24min (72 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 10min
- Energy: ~343 kWh
- Distance: 2207km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range |
| Travel time |
22h 24min |
23h 36min |
| Charging time: |
1h 10min |
2h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~397 kWh |
~399 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Hadikgasse (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Donautal Ost (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Haidt Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Ford Capri Extended Range Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 32% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (16 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (16 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle Wientalstraße (15 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (13 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (15 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
Rastplatz Helderloh (11 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 72-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range on this 2207km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 10min vs 2h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~343 kWh vs ~362 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons