In our Bucharest to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model Y Performance by 52 minutes, completing the 2207km route in 22h 24min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 24min (52 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 10min
- Energy: ~343 kWh
- Distance: 2207km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
22h 24min |
23h 16min |
| Charging time: |
1h 10min |
1h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~397 kWh |
~398 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Hadikgasse (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Donautal Ost (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Haidt Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (15 min, 25% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (11 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Hadikgasse (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Salzburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Select Hotel (10 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Raststätte Epgert (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 11:
Rastplatz Helderloh (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 52-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Performance on this 2207km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 10min vs 1h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~343 kWh vs ~403 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons