In our Bucharest to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 45 e-tron quattro by 44 minutes, completing the 1676km route in 17h 26min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 26min (44 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~274 kWh
- Distance: 1676km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 45 e-tron quattro |
| Travel time |
17h 26min |
18h 10min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
1h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q4 45 e-tron quattro Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (16 min, 27% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (10 min, 21% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
OC Karlov (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King Kutnohorská (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Esso Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 44-minute advantage over Audi Q4 45 e-tron quattro on this 1676km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 1h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~274 kWh vs ~329 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons