In our Bucharest to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 1676km route in 17h 26min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 26min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~274 kWh
- Distance: 1676km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 26min |
17h 40min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 34% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Lamačská cesta (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
HEM Tankstelle Hansastraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1676km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~274 kWh vs ~301 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons