In our Bucharest to Berlin EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 113 minutes, completing the 1676km route in 17h 39min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 39min (113 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~308 kWh
- Distance: 1676km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
17h 39min |
19h 32min |
| Charging time: |
1h 2min |
2h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Lamačská cesta (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
HEM Tankstelle Hansastraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (36 min, 15% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (24 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (13 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Ladná směr Brno (11 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 7:
OC Karlov (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Burger King Kutnohorská (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Esso Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Rasthof Berstetal (10 min, 10% → 34%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 113-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1676km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 2h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~308 kWh vs ~370 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons