In our Bucharest to Berlin EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 4 minutes, completing the 1676km route in 17h 35min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance's 512km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023's 500km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023
- Total time: 17h 35min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~251 kWh
- Distance: 1676km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 |
| Travel time |
17h 39min |
17h 35min |
| Charging time: |
1h 2min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Lamačská cesta (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
HEM Tankstelle Hansastraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (14 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (19 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Hansastraße (10 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Won
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 achieved a 4-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1676km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~251 kWh vs ~308 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons