In our Bucharest to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 3 minutes, completing the 1889km route in 19h 51min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 51min (3 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1889km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 54min |
19h 51min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
57min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Hadikgasse (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Franz-Marc-Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Weißensberg Autohaus Riess (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 3-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1889km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 1h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~308 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons