In our Bucharest to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 27 minutes, completing the 1889km route in 19h 54min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 54min (27 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 1min
- Energy: ~308 kWh
- Distance: 1889km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
19h 54min |
20h 21min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
1h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Bern
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (11 min, 32% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Roggendorf (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Innpark (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Raststätte Thurau Nord (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 27-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 1889km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 1min vs 1h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~308 kWh vs ~334 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons