In our Bucharest to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 82 minutes, completing the 1885km route in 19h 51min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 51min (82 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~293 kWh
- Distance: 1885km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 51min |
21h 13min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
2h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~339 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Hadikgasse (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Franz-Marc-Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Weißensberg Autohaus Riess (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (14 min, 27% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (14 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV eMotion Parndorf Outlet Center (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Roggendorf (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Weißensberg Autohaus Riess (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 10:
Migrol Service (11 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 82-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1885km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 2h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~293 kWh vs ~349 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons