In our Bucharest to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 108 minutes, completing the 1885km route in 19h 51min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 51min (108 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~293 kWh
- Distance: 1885km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
19h 51min |
21h 39min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
2h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~339 kWh |
~340 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Hadikgasse (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Franz-Marc-Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Weißensberg Autohaus Riess (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bern
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 75% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (23 min, 15% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (25 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Páty Nord (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Hadikgasse (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Burger King (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 12:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 13:
Migrol Service (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 108-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1885km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 2h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~293 kWh vs ~344 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons