In our Bucharest to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 65 minutes, completing the 1886km route in 20h 8min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 8min (65 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~338 kWh
- Distance: 1886km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 13min |
20h 8min |
| Charging time: |
2h 14min |
1h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~339 kWh |
~341 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (14 min, 27% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (14 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV eMotion Parndorf Outlet Center (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Roggendorf (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Weißensberg Autohaus Riess (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 10:
Migrol Service (11 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (10 min, 34% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (13 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tópark (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Hadikgasse (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Meggenhofen (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Migrol (10 min, 16% → 60%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 65-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1886km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 2h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~338 kWh vs ~349 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons