In our Bucharest to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 42 minutes, completing the 1892km route in 20h 8min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 8min (42 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~339 kWh
- Distance: 1892km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
20h 8min |
20h 50min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
1h 55min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~341 kWh |
~340 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (10 min, 34% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (13 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tópark (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Hadikgasse (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Meggenhofen (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Migrol (10 min, 16% → 60%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (19 min, 21% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Hadikgasse (11 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Salzburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Franz-Marc-Straße (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 9:
Rastplatz Stegen (11 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 42-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1892km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 1h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~339 kWh vs ~423 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons