In our Bucharest to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 47 minutes, completing the 820km route in 8h 52min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 52min (47 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 15min
- Energy: ~128 kWh
- Distance: 820km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 52min |
9h 39min |
| Charging time: |
15min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~148 kWh |
~148 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (15 min, 22% → 76%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (21 min, 13% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 47-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 820km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 15min vs 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~128 kWh vs ~136 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons