In our Bucharest to Budapest EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 38 minutes, completing the 821km route in 9h 1min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 1min (38 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~147 kWh
- Distance: 821km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 1min |
9h 39min |
| Charging time: |
23min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~148 kWh |
~148 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (10 min, 34% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (13 min, 15% → 68%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (21 min, 13% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 38-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 821km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons