In our Bucharest to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 22 minutes, completing the 2534km route in 26h 18min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 18min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 23min
- Energy: ~394 kWh
- Distance: 2534km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
26h 40min |
26h 18min |
| Charging time: |
1h 42min |
1h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~456 kWh |
~456 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY PADO Shopping Galerien (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
JBC (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 10:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: London
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Hadikgasse (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Donautal Ost (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Haidt Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 22-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2534km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 23min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~394 kWh vs ~465 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons