In our Bucharest to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 8 minutes, completing the 2663km route in 30h 34min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 34min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~414 kWh
- Distance: 2663km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
30h 42min |
30h 34min |
| Charging time: |
1h 37min |
1h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~479 kWh |
~479 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Væggerløsevej (12 min, 16% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Pávov Sever (10 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Farø (17 min, 14% → 75%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 8-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 2663km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 29min vs 1h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~414 kWh vs ~435 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons