In our Bucharest to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BMW i4 eDrive35 by 91 minutes, completing the 2298km route in 23h 3min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 3min (91 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~375 kWh
- Distance: 2298km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BMW i4 eDrive35 |
| Travel time |
23h 3min |
24h 34min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
2h 41min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~414 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Bonfelder Straße (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
BMW i4 eDrive35 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (19 min, 13% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (22 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (11 min, 19% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV eMotion Parndorf Outlet Center (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Würth (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 12:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (19 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 91-minute advantage over BMW i4 eDrive35 on this 2298km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 2h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~375 kWh vs ~402 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons