In our Bucharest to Paris EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 79 minutes, completing the 2300km route in 23h 22min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 22min (79 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 31min
- Energy: ~422 kWh
- Distance: 2300km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 41min |
23h 22min |
| Charging time: |
2h 52min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
12 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~414 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (14 min, 27% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (14 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV eMotion Parndorf Outlet Center (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Roggendorf (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Total Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 9:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
ATU (15 min, 16% → 56%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 12:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (19 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY PADO Shopping Galerien (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 79-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2300km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 31min vs 2h 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~422 kWh vs ~426 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons